Historically, the U.S. housing market has lead the country out of recession. But that has not happened during the Great Recession of recent years. In an interview with CNBC (video below) Jonathan Miller, CEO of Miller Samuel Inc., said the housing market “will be one step behind the economy” because tight credit conditions related to legacy lending conditions are preventing consumers from taking advantage of market opportunities. He did point to a few bright spots with relatively strong markets such as Manhattan and metro D.C. That being said, we should not expect to see substantial price increases in Manhattan either. In a different interview, Mr. Miller said of the local market, “We’re not seeing prices rise very much . . . 2011 will be rather boring.”
Guest Post – Shaun Meller’s Weekly Economic Summary
Last week in review – (March 7 – 11, 2011)
Shaun Meller is a mortgage professional at Bank of America specializing in financing for Manhattan condos, co-ops, and townhomes.
First, let us extend our deepest sympathies to the families affected by last week’s earthquake and tsunami in Japan and our hope for a speedy recovery. The earthquake was a magnitude of 8.9—the strongest in 140 years. The earthquake in Japan and its damage created some counterintuitive market reactions.
Ordinarily, U.S. Treasuries and mortgage bonds would trade higher in the face of devastating natural events that drive money into “safe haven” trades. But in this case, buying of Treasuries and mortgage bonds as a safe haven trade was offset by the Japanese selling some of their own massive holdings of Treasuries and mortgage bonds in order to repatriate money back to their country during this time of emergency. Considering that Japan is the second largest holder of U.S. debt at $877 billion, selling just a small portion of their holdings has an impact on bond prices.
In addition, bond prices traded in very volatile fashion last week after getting jockeyed around on news out of Saudi Arabia that police had opened fire on protesters with rubber bullets. Let’s look at how this influenced the markets in a different way than one might at first imagine.
Oil fell last week, despite the news out of Saudi Arabia. Why? Shouldn’t unrest in Saudi Arabia – the world’s largest oil producer – push prices higher? Yes, but that news was offset by the earthquake in Japan. That’s because Japan is a huge importer of oil, and the market senses that the earthquake and subsequent tsunami may create an economic slowdown and diminish the demand for oil.
Seeing that mortgage bonds are lower – even in the face of weak stocks and enormous uncertain global news – tells us that the gains in bonds are not coming with a lot of conviction, and traders are selling into this strength. This is because a lot of headwinds remain for bonds – like inflation abroad, rising government debt and continued QE2 purchases.
In the news this week (March 14 – 18, 2011)
There are multiple reports this week focusing on the same segments of the economy. We’ll talk about these reports next week and their impact on the bond market:
- Federal Reserve report
- Tuesday – Federal Open Market Committee releases policy statement
- Housing markets reports
- Wednesday – Housing Starts and Building Permits
- Manufacturing reports
- Tuesday – Empire State Index
- Thursday – Philadelphia Fed Index
- Thursday – Capacity Utilization
- Thursday – Industrial Production
- Employment reports
- Thursday – Initial and Continuing Jobless Claims
- Inflation reports
- Wednesday – Producer Price Index
- Thursday – Consumer Price Index
As you can see by the arrows in the chart below, bond prices experienced some up-and-down volatility last week, but ended the week near where they began.
I’m here to help you through the entire home-financing process – from application through closing – and to match you with a mortgage that’s perfect for your financial situation. Contact me today and let’s get started on achieving your home financing goals.
Why the Case-Shiller Index Has Little Relevance in Manhattan
The S&P | Case-Shiller Home Price Indices (CSI) is one of the most widely cited housing reports in the United States, and arguably the most respected by both economists and residential real estate experts. Started by Robert Shiller of Yale University and Karl Case of Wellesley College, the index uses a three month moving average of home sales in twenty U.S. metropolitan regions, it operates on a sixty day delay, and it only tracks sales of properties that have sold twice (in an effort to best gauge price changes by measuring appreciation or depreciation at the same property), and it is not seasonally adjusted.
On February 23, 2011, the NY Times wrote an article analyzing the latest data from the index. On the same day, Crain’s published an article stating that New York-area housing prices hit 7-year low. The day before, the NY Post noted that home prices tumble to new lows. The following day, the Wall Street Journal covered the index’s release and noted that Home prices slide despite recovery. So what does all of this mean for Manhattan real estate?
This article is not an evaluation of the methods or an analysis of the data used by the CSI. We do not question that it is one of the best reports available for the national market. This is also not an admonition of the above New York based news publications that published the data. They all have a national readership and are not writing just for New Yorkers. What I would like to do is shed some light on the report in an effort to assist New York real estate sellers and buyers in understanding what the report does and does not say about our market.
Here is what you need to understand:
- The CSI excludes the sale of both condos and co-ops in its analysis. Condos and co-ops constitute approximately 98% of the sales of Manhattan residential real estate, 46% of Brooklyn sales, 42% of sales in the Bronx, and 40% of sales in Queens.
- The CSI excludes new construction sales (as they only count properties that have sold twice), though according to StreetEasy there are 445 new construction projects in Manhattan right now.
- The CSI includes many locations in the New York metropolitan area that might surprise Manhattanites. For example:
- Fairfield and New Haven, Connecticut
- Bergen Essex, Hudson, Hunterdon, Ocean, Passaic, Morris, Monmouth, Middlesex, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren, New Jersey
- Dutchess, Nassau, Orange, Putnam, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk, and Westchester, New York
- Pike, Pennsylvania
Jonathan Miller, president and CEO of appraisal firm Miller Samuel stated last year that,
“Case-Shiller is an index of single-family homes, and it’s terrific for measuring housing markets that are heavily concentrated with single-family homes,” but how relevant is that to analyzing the state of the Manhattan market? Noah Rosenblatt, founder of data analytics and consulting firm Urban Digs, told the Real Deal that “It takes into account counties in New Jersey and Pennsylvania . . . If you’re following Manhattan real estate, you can’t compare places like that to Manhattan.”
What concerns us at Village Confidential is that most Manhattan buyers and sellers do not care to analyze the data set relied upon by national housing indices. They open up their paper (or more likely click on their favorites link) and they read articles from the NY Times, the Journal, the Post, and Crain’s, and many of them will extrapolate from the commentary and the data that “so goes the CSI, so goes Manhattan real estate.”
So the question is, to what extent will national headlines (sometimes in local newspapers) affect buyer and seller sentiment in Manhattan? What say you?
Guest Post – Weekly Economic Summary by Shaun Meller of Bank of America
Last week in review – (January 31 – February 4, 2011)
The Labor Department reported that 36,000 jobs were created in January, a much lower
number than anticipated. However, there were upward revisions to both November and December, which added another 40,000 jobs than previously reported.
But that’s not the only bit of good news in the report. The unemployment rate fell to 9%, down from 9.4% last month, rather than increasing as had been expected. In addition, the U6 unemployment report, which includes job seekers who haven’t actively looked for a job recently and those who have accepted part-time employment for economic reasons, fell to 16.1%, from the previous month of 16.7% and reflects the lowest level since April 2009.
So what does all of this mean when it comes to home loan rates?
It’s important to remember two things:
- First, the Fed’s goals for their current Quantitative Easing policy (QE2) where $600 billion is being injected into the economy are to: (1) boost stock prices, (2) create inflation, and (3) lower the unemployment rate.
- Second, while these goals are designed to stimulate our economy and keep our recovery moving forward, they are also unfriendly to bonds and home loan rates.
In recent weeks, we’ve seen evidence of all three goals: stocks have been improving, the unemployment rate has declined, and we’ve seen an increase in global unrest of late, not just in Egypt, but in other parts of the world as well and much of this centers around runaway inflation in commodities and food.
In the news this week (February 7 – 11, 2011)
This has been a quiet week on the economic report front, though with all the news happening around the world, there’s plenty of action that could impact the markets.
- Thursday’s weekly Initial and Continuing Jobless Claims Report. Last week, Initial Jobless Claims declined to 415,000, which was below the 425,000 expected, and reversed most of the increase from the previous week. We’ll talk about this week’s report next time and its impact on the bond market.
As you can see in the chart below, bonds and home loan rates worsened due to a mix of positive economic news, a decline in unemployment, and hints of inflation in the air.
Chart: Fannie Mae 4.0% Mortgage Bond (Friday, February 4, 2011)
Economic calendar for the week of February 7–11, 2011
I’m here to help you through the entire home-financing process – from application through closing – and to match you with a mortgage that’s perfect for your financial situation. Contact me today and let’s get started on achieving your home financing goals.
Guest Post – Weekly Economic Summary by Shaun Meller of Bank of America
Last week in review – (January 17 – 21, 2011)
The US dollar is starting 2011 with its value dropping relative to other currencies.
Let’s take a look at why and what this could mean for home loan rates.
- Some of the dollar’s drop is attributed to the recent strength in the euro, which has gotten a boost from some recent positive stories, like Spain and Portugal’s ability to sell debt in the bond market without crisis. But have Europe’s problems gone away? No – there will be more problems ahead for the region, and as they emerge, we should see a reversal in the euro’s strength along with improvement in the US dollar.
- Another reason for the dollar’s weakness is the Fed’s Quantitative Easing (known as QE2).
At this point, the weakening US dollar hasn’t had a big negative effect on the US bond market, but should the dollar materially weaken, it could make US-denominated assets like US bonds less valuable and desirable amongst global investors and it has been these foreign investors, like China, who have supported the US bond market for years by purchasing our debt. Remember, home loan rates are tied to mortgage backed securities, which are a type of bond. So negative news for bonds would also be bad news for home loan rates.
In housing news last week, existing home sales for December were reported much better than expected. The jump in sales is likely attributed in part to the recent trend of rising home loan rates, which has prompted many homebuyers to take advantage of the still low home loan rates. Building permits – which signal future construction – also came in better than expected last week, surging 17% in December.
The housing industry shows signs of improvement in 2011. There will still be some areas that suffer price declines, and those will be where foreclosure backlogs overhang and where unemployment rates are higher than the national average. But housing looks to have bottomed out in many areas and should see more of a pick up in the second half of 2011. And although home loan rates will likely rise slightly as the year progresses, they are still near all-time lows right now.
In the news this week (January 24 – 28, 2011)
This week includes a full load of economic reports ranging from housing and the economy – but the big event will be the Fed meeting. We’ll discuss impact of these events in next week’s report.
- The week started with a read on consumer attitudes with the Consumer Confidence report on Tuesday. That report will be followed by the Consumer Sentiment Index on Friday.
- We also saw additional housing news this week, with a report on New Home Sales in December on Wednesday and the Pending Home Sales report for December on Thursday.
- The Federal Reserve held its FOMC meeting this Tuesday and Wednesday, with the Fed’s Policy Statement released Wednesday afternoon. There’s no chance for an interest rate hike at this meeting but what the Fed says about the economy, inflation, and its Quantitative Easing program could have an impact on rates.
- Thursday’s weekly Initial and Continuing Jobless Claims Report is important, as always. Last week, Initial Jobless Claims came in below expectations and the 4-week moving average fell from the previous week. Those readings tell us the trend in the labor market is continuing to improve, albeit at a slower pace than historically seen at this stage within an economic recovery.
- We also got a read on the economic recovery with Durable Good Orders on Thursday. This report provides an update on consumer and business buying behavior on big-ticket items that are designed to last for an extended period of time, like furniture, televisions, appliances, vehicles, copy machines, and so on. It’s an interesting report, as people tend to hold back on these types of purchases when they are feeling a need to be extra conservative with their finances or feel insecure about their employment.
- The GDP report will be followed on Friday with reports on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) – which is the broadest measure of economic activity – and the Employment Cost Index (ECI). The ECI is one way to evaluate wage trends and the risk of wage inflation, as well as possible price pressures. This is important to the housing industry because if wage inflation threatens, it is possible home loan rates will rise through bond prices dropping.
As you can see in the chart below, bonds and home loan rates continued their negative trend to end the week worse than where they started.
I’m here to help you through the entire home-financing process – from application through closing – and to match you with a mortgage that’s perfect for your financial situation. Contact me today and let’s get started on achieving your home financing goals.
Related Articles
Bumpy Ride on the Road to Recovery
Lyrics to Bumpy Ride by Robyn:
Even though it’s a bumpy ride
Keep your head above the waterline
Keep focused and you’ll make it through
Keep on rollin’ is what you’ve got to do
Even though it’s a bumpy ride don’t you slip and don’t you slide
The second decade of the third millennium has begun and there are a number of events to look out for this year that could affect the real estate markets both locally and nationally.
1. U.S. Avoids the Dreaded Double-Dip
The threat of the double-dip has haunted America since “green shoots” were spotted by Ben Bernanke back in April of 2009. Fears were recently stoked by the release of the latest S&P/Case-Shiller Index showing declines in 18 of the 20 cities represented in the index. However, expect the tax cut extensions and payroll tax decrease to keep the U.S. out of recession. GDP growth will likely be in the 2.5% range (+ or – 50 basis points), not nearly enough to put a significant dent in unemployment, and most will use the tax cut savings to pay down bills.
2. Homeownership Rate Will Continue to Decline
The homeownership rate in the United States peaked in 2004 with 69.4% of the population owning their primary residence. That number has now slid to 66.9% and could reach as low as 62% in 2012 (the lowest level since 1960). Although historically low pricing and interest rates should be assisting buyers in the market, there are a number of factors that continue to put pressure on the homeownership rate. Stubbornly high unemployment continues to prevent many purchasers from making large financial decisions, whether they are currently unemployed or simply fearful of the possibility that they could be. Additionally, the millions of owners who lost their properties in foreclosures, sold them in a short sale, or defaulted before selling the property in a traditional sale, are now struggling with tainted credit and tighter credit guidelines in the mortgage market. Finally, the current administration has suggested that it could reconsider some of the policies that have been at the foundation of the increased homeownership rate in the past half-century including the mortgage interest deduction, public-private partnerships (i.e. FNMA and FMCC) that subsidize the mortgage industry and keep interest rates low, and capital gains tax exclusions for primary residences.
3. Issues With MERS Could Slow the Foreclosure Process
State Supreme courts have begun to question the legal standing of the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (aka “MERS”). MERS is a privately held company formed in 2004 that operates an electronic registry designed to track the ownership of mortgage loans nationwide. Essentially, the company asserts to be the mortgage owner’s nominee for the security interest (the mortgage or deed of trust) indicated by the notes transferred by lenders, investors, and their loan servicers in county land records. Wall Street used MERS to speed the securitization process and later foreclosures. Courts have addressed a number of legal issues regarding the system including the electronic notarization of documents, the legitimacy of notarizations done across state lines, and whether the company has standing to act as the plaintiff in a mortgage foreclosure. Expect Congress to address reform in 2011.
4. Foreclosures Will Increase
According to CoreLogic Inc., more than 10.8 million homeowners, or 22.5% of all mortgage borrowers, are underwater. These owners cannot sell without a short sale and are at risk of defaulting if any additional pressure is put on their household income or if they decide a strategic default is in their best interest. Legal issues including the robo-signing scandal, issues with MERS, and continuing pressure from States’ Attorney General have slowed down the foreclosure machine in many states, but expect that process to reverse in early 2011. That reversal should eventually help to clear out the market. However, shadow inventory persists in many forms (i.e. owners who defaulted but who benefit from slow foreclosures in judicial foreclosure states, REO on the books of banks but not released to the market, and inventory held by private owners who are waiting for a market rebound to attempt to sell). All of this increased inventory along with decreasing national demand will likely lead to a slow housing recovery at best.
5. Apartment Living Will Continue to Increase
With the homeownership rate continuing to slide demand for apartment housing is on the rise and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. Demographic trends that point toward increased demand include overall population growth, echo boomers entering the housing market, continued high levels of immigration, a continued shift in household composition away from the traditional married couple with children toward single person or single parent households, and a return to urban centers by populations currently living in the suburbs. The increased demand has already placed upward pressure on rental pricing nationwide and a lack of inventory and planned multi-family housing starts in the coming years will continue to do so.
6. Bankrupt Municipalities and Broke States
We can expect Detroit and at least one other city in Michigan to go bankrupt this year. Other potential victims of municipal largess and dwindling tax revenues include Los Angeles, Miami, Oakland, Houston, and San Diego. The discussion of such events is already affecting the bond markets. In legal circles, discussions are developing on the prudence of amending the law to permit states to file (think Illinois, California, Arizona, and Nevada). Currently, states can run out of money but do not have the protection of bankruptcy. The formal process of debt discharge may be the quickest road to recovery available and the only way to deal with massive unfunded obligations such as pension contracts. Additionally, now that Republicans have taken over the house and a large minority of the Senate, we can expect less enthusiasm for any plan to redistribute federal funds to states. This will certainly lead to continued cutbacks and major reductions in public services.
7. Unions Will Be Under Attack
Due to growing budget deficits and a public backlash against massive benefit programs, elected officials from states such as Maine, Ohio, and Arizona are pushing legislation to limit the power of labor unions, particularly those representing government workers. New governors are looking at every line item of their budget and finding that the salaries and pensions of government employees make up a significant portion of state budgets. Particularly in Republican states, politicians are pursuing aggressive structural changes aimed at weakening the bargaining power and political influence of unions, including ones in the private sector.
8. China Overheats Before the U.S. Recovers
Analysts have a close eye on the Chinese government as it takes steps to rein in inflation without derailing its red-hot economy. China may be expected to grow at 5-6% this year, but that is nowhere near as much as their government wants or the world expects. These could lead to the bursting of their property bubble and could pressure commodities as well as possibly derailing the global economic recovery.
9. Property Bubbles Finally Deflate in Australia and Canada
Australia, who has largely avoided the global recession may see its luck come to an end. Expect their economy to come to outright recession and look for Canada to slow as its real estate markets deflate. In November, The Economist released a report stating that Canada’s housing market was overvalued by as much as 24%.
If you would like to speak to a member of our team about about how to customize your investment strategy in Manhattan or Brooklyn or to speak about finding a new home in the area, please call (212) 400-4838 or e-mail yourkeytothecity@AkerlyRE.com.
Deflation, Inflation, Interest Rates, and Home Pricing
The psychology of deflation has worked to put continued downward pressure on nationwide home prices over the past twenty-four months. The deflationary spiral works like this:
1. Consumer spending slows by choice (purchasers are “deal hunting”), or by discretion (purchasers are taking a “wait-and-see” approach), or by necessity (e.g. job cuts); then
2. Stocks are sold off as corporations anticipate falling gross revenues and lower net profits. Business spending slows and lay-offs increase in an effect to conserve capital.
3. Investors use their capital recouped in the sell-off of stocks to invest in safer asset classes such as government-backed bonds. As a result of the increased demand for bonds, mortgage interest rates move lower. This is because an increased demand from investors in bonds means those investors will be forced to accept a lower yield.
4. Lower stock prices make it more difficult for corporations to secure new debt or meet existing debt obligations (e.g. refinancing).
5. Some businesses continue to lay off workers in an effort to conserve capital and address falling revenues. Others lower prices on their goods and services in an effort to increase consumer demand.
6. The spiral starts over again at #1 as consumers are impacted by the cycle.
In an effort to address the deflationary spiral that has gripped the U.S. economy, the Federal Reserve has initiated a second round of Quantitative Easing (Q.E. 2). Pursuant to quantitative easing, the Fed purchases U.S. Treasuries and bonds in an effort to stimulate the economy by 1) creating inflation that will spur consumer spending; 2) lowering the unemployment rate by increasing consumer demand; and 3) raising the price of stocks by increasing consumer demand that results in increased revenues. You may ask why would the Fed want to create inflation – isn’t that a bad thing? The idea is that consumers would accelerate a purchasing decision in order to beat an anticipated price hike. That increase in consumer spending will lead to an increase in corporate profits which will lead to an increase in job growth which will lead to increased consumer confidence – and hopefully an end to the deflationary spiral.
What does this all mean for housing prices? Certainly putting an end to the deflationary spiral will help housing, right? Well, not so fast. Inflation is the arch nemesis of investors in bonds. Even the smell of inflation will drive investors out of bonds and into equities. When there is a lower demand for bonds, interest rates go up (meaning yields go up) in an effort to lure in bond investors with higher returns. Higher bond yields mean higher mortgage interest rates for consumers. And, as many of you know, higher mortgage interest rates mean downward pressure on home prices. A purchaser can theoretically only spend so much per month on their housing costs. When interest rates are low, it lowers their monthly payments making it easier to afford a more expensive house. However, when interest rates increase, that makes the monthly payment more expensive and usually leads to lower prices in the housing market.
Last week, there was evidence that inflation is rising in China and that the Chinese government would raise rates to fight it. Investors seeking their highest return on their investment will be more interested in Chinese bonds than the lower returns they will receive on U.S. bonds, thus raising mortgage interest rates in the U.S. And, we haven’t even begun to feel the effects of Q.E. 2 that the Fed hopes for. The inflationary spiral may have already begun.
So, if deflation leads to lower home prices and inflation leads to lower home prices, what should home purchasers be thinking? The real question is about purchasing power. Let’s assume a further 10% drop in housing prices over the next year, a $1mil property, with 25% down ($750k mortgage) and let’s look at the effect of interest rates rising 110 basis points over the same period:
1. 4.4% jumbo mortgage = $3,755 in monthly debt service
2. 5.0% = $,4,026 in monthly debt service (a 6% increase)
3. 5.5% = $4,258 in month debt service (a 13% increase)
This data demonstrates that a 6% drop in housing prices would be required to keep your monthly payments the same as they are with today’s interest rates if interest rates go up 500 basis points. If interest rates on a jumbo mortgage go up to 5.5%, then a 13% drop in home prices would be required to keep the monthly debt service at break even with today. How bearish are you?
Related Articles
- Why Interest Rates Keep Rising, Despite QE2 (dailyfinance.com)
- Deflation Concerns Diminish at the Fed (nytimes.com)
- Fed’s mysterious policy: How will we know if it’s working? (seattletimes.nwsource.com)











